Defisit Tindak Tutur Penderita Skizofrenia di Balikpapan: Kajian Pragmatik Klinis

Main Article Content

Yessy Ade Winarti
M. Jafar Haruna
Bibit Suhatmady

Abstract

This study aims to examine the form of speech act deficit and conversation structure deficit in the speech of schizophrenia patients at Klinik Ego Balikpapan. This research is qualitative research with a clinical pragmatics approach. The research location is at Klinik Kesehatan Jiwa Ego Balikpapan. This research's data collection technique is free listening (SBLC). The data analysis technique is through data collection, reduction, presentation, analysis, and conclusion. The results of the research on the form of speech act deficit of schizophrenia patients: (1) descriptive locution deficit, (2) assertive illocution deficit, and (3) declarative illocution deficit. The conversational structure deficits found: were (1) conversational turns, (2) adjacent pairs, and (3) pauses. Patients experience pragmatic deficits with a pattern of not being able to speak with a completely clear sentence pronunciation, often repeating sentences, and their speech is slightly slower than normal people in general. However, interlocutors can accept the communication skills of schizophrenic patients because they have good information power. Patients can be invited to talk even though the answer response is chattering according to their wishes as a form of their delusions, and there are some utterances with words with unclear meanings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Winarti, Y. A., Haruna, M. J., & Suhatmady, B. (2023). Defisit Tindak Tutur Penderita Skizofrenia di Balikpapan: Kajian Pragmatik Klinis. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.647
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Yessy Ade Winarti, Universitas Mulawarman

Universitas Mulawarman
Jl. Muara Pahu Kampus Gunung Kelua, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia
Email: yessythasi@gmail.com
Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9354-2854

M. Jafar Haruna, Universitas Mulawarman

Universitas Mulawarman
Jl. Muara Pahu Kampus Gunung Kelua, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia
Email: jafar12haruna@gmail.com
Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1333-9612

Bibit Suhatmady, Universitas Mulawarman

Universitas Mulawarman
Jl. Muara Pahu Kampus Gunung Kelua, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia
Email: bitsuteaching@yahoo.com.au
Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-6631

References

Al-Mubarrok, M. R., Machdalena, S., & Fachrullah, T. A. (2021). Kemampuan Berbahasa dalam Praktik Berbicara pada Pengidap Skizofrenia. Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 17(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.25134/fon.v17i1.4197
Al Jufri, M. I., & Wargadinata, W. (2022). Variasi dan Fungsi Tindak Tutur dalam Ceramah KH. Marzuki Mustamar (Kajian Pragmatik). Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(4), 807–820. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i4.491
Cummings, L. (2010). Pragmatik Klinis: Kajian tentang Penggunaan dan Gangguan Bahasa Secara Klinis. Pustaka Pelajar.
Djatmika. (2016). Mengenal Pragmatik Yuk. Pustaka Pelajar.
Farasara, F. P. (2003). Spirit of Place: Manusia dan Fenomena yang Terlihat [Universitas Indonesia]. https://www.lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20245811
Gawen, A. B. (2017). Pembelajaran Pragmatik. Ombak.
Hudiyono, Y. (2021). Wacana Percakapan Instruksional: Kajian Struktur, Strategi, dan Fungsi. Istana Agency.
Hudiyono, Y., Rokhmansyah, A., & Elyana, K. (2021). Class Conversation Strategies in Junior High Schools: Study of Conversation Analysis. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 725–738. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V16I2.5649
Kusno, A., Arifin, M. B., & Mulawarman, W. G. (2022). Identifikasi Konteks Ekstralingual Virtual Bahasa Media Sosial sebagai Penunjang Analisis Bahasa sebagai Alat Bukti Hukum. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(1s), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i1s.401
Mahsun, M. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode Metode Baru. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Prutting, C. A., & Kittchner, D. M. (1987). A Clinical Appraisal of the Pragmatic Aspects of Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5202.105
Rofiqi, A., & Yulianto, B. (n.d.). Defisit Pragmatik Tuturan Anak Autis dalam Rangkaian Proses Pemerolehan Bahasa di SMP Negeri 13 Surabaya. https://www.academia.edu/35754571/Defisit_Pragmatik_Tuturan_Anak_Autis_dalam_Proses_Pemerolehan_Bahasa_1_DEFISIT_PRAGMATIK_TUTURAN_ANAK_AUTIS_DALAM_RANGKAIAN_PROSES_PEMEROLEHAN_BAHASA_DI_SMP_NEGERI_13_SURABAYA
Sugiyono. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suryani, Y. (2017). Defisit Pragmatik Tuturan Penderita Skizofrenia di RS Jiwa Menur Surabaya : Kajian Pragmatik Klinis. Jurnal Pena Indonesia, 1(2), 105–141. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpi.v1n2.p101-144
Sutrisna, I. P. G. (2019). Defisit Tuturan Anak Tuna Rungu dalam Wacana Akademik di SLB Negeri Gianyar (Kajian Pragmatik Klinis). Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Seni, 7(2), 327–340. https://ojs.mahadewa.ac.id/index.php/stilistika/article/view/292
Tarmini, W., Ghani, A. R. A., & Pangaribuan, M. A. N. (2021). Model Pertuturan Anak Down Syndrome SMA Luar Biasa Dian Grahita Jakarta: Kajian Pragmatik. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 4(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i3.127
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.