Bahasa slang positif vs negatif pada gen z di Sumatera Barat Positive and negative slang in gen z in West Sumatera
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The inventiveness of teenagers—including those in West Sumatra—is what leads to the diversity in language usage. Abbreviations and acronyms have a role in the creation of slang. The purpose of this study is to characterize the different types of slang, their definitions, and the variables that affect their usage or emergence. The research employs a descriptive qualitative methodology that involves the use of skilled listening and engagement strategies to collect data, as well as recording and note-taking tools. data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion-drawing are the steps in the data analysis process. The results of data analysis show that the use of slang by Gen Z in Padang City has two forms of slang, namely abbreviations and acronyms, slang with a positive meaning is 14 data, in general the slang is an abbreviation of several regional names, while slang with a negative meaning is 15. In general, slang is an abbreviation of the words sarcasm, insults, insults and ridicule. Factors in the use of slang by Gen Z in West Sumatra are social factors, and developments in the times that are increasingly developing, including being considered modern slang, and keeping up with current developments.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Astuti, N. (2014). Singkatan dan Akronim di Kalangan Remaja di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Bahtera Sastra Indonesia, 2(1), 1–10. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/BS_Antologi_Ind/article/view/516
Chaer, A. (2013). Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia. Rineka Cipta.
Chaer, A., & Leony, A. (2015). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Rineka Cipta.
Ekalestari, S., Barus, E., Hasibuan, A., & Ananda, T. (2022). Penggunaan Abreviasi dan Akronim dalam Berkomunikasi oleh Pengguna Media Sosial. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 5(1), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i1.1146
Febrina, R., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). Istilah yang Digunakan Gubernur Sumatera Barat dalam Mengatasi Penyebaran Covid-19. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 5(2), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i2.320
Florian, C. (2005). Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speakers’ Choices. Cambridge University Press.
Hajjah, F., & Kesuma, T. M. J. (2023). Proses Pembentukan Slang Ceindan di kota Samarinda. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 763–780. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.722
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Edisi Kelima). (2017). Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kesuma, T. M. J. (2007). Pengantar (Metode) Penelitian Bahasa. Carasvatibooks.
Kridalaksana, H. (2010). Pembentukan Kata dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Lutviana, R., & Mafulah, S. (2021). The Use of Slang Words in Online Learning Context of EFL Class. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka): Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 6(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v6i1.6118
Mahsun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Noviatri, N. (2015). Singkatan dan Akronim dalam Surat Kabar: Kajian Bentuk dan Proses. Jurnal Arbitrer, 2(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.2.1.28-43.2015
Rahmah, F. A., & Khasanah, I. (2023). Kreativitas Generasi Z Menggunakan Bahasa Prokem dalam Berkomunikasi pada Aplikasi TikTok. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.675
Setiawan, H. (2019). Bahasa Slang di Angkringan Kabupaten Ponorogo. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 10(1), 137–148. https://madah.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/madah/article/view/190
Sudaryanto. (2018). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Duta Wacana University Press.
Sumarsono, & Paina, P. (2017). Sosiolinguistik. Pustaka Pelajar.
Tasyarasita, A. Z., Duhita, M. E., Yulianti, W., & Yustanto, H. (2023). Ragam Bahasa Slang oleh Remaja Gen Z Pada Media Sosial TikTok (Kajian Sosiolinguistik). Translation and Linguistics (Transling), 3(2), 98–109. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/transling/article/view/74673
Winarno, A. (1991). Kamus Singkatan dan Akronim Baru dan Lama. Kanisius.